Predictive Programming
From Red Ice Radio, Feb 25th, 2007:
Adam Weishaupt said, the greatest way to attract people into a movement is to give them a great mystery. They are very good at giving us red herrings down through history to chase, which fascinate us, and yet bring us to the conclusion that they want, which is that there’s nothing you can do about something as preordained, as planned, as this. And so you go along with it. This is the same trick they used with Revelation in the Bible for thousands of years. You can’t do anything about it, it’s written in that book. This is a predictive programming.
Watt coined this term. At least, he got credit for it.1 But what I wonder is, did he consider that “predictive programming” might also be an inadvertent effect of conspiracy researchers having helped to create a “second matrix,” thereby spreading narratives of control that are predictive, because they are programming people to submit to them?
On Red Ice Radio one month before, Watt said this of the controllers:
it creates awe in the listener to think, “Oh, they’re so powerful and they have this magic,” etc. So you realize, no, they run mainly on science and money, of course, big money. And secrecy. And they are the only ones on the planet who are directing the course of the future of the planet.
Predictive programming, like “Revelation of the Method,” is a weirdly circular, self-reinforcing idea, the idea that hidden elites use the idea that they exercise total control over us to ensure that they exercise total control over us.
As I put it at my first ever “paranoid-awareness” site, in 1997 (at Geocities), “There is a worldwide conspiracy to create the belief in a worldwide conspiracy, to create the belief . . .” (This suggests I was onto the second matrix idea, even before the first Matrix movie came out).
So has the idea of predictive programming—as coined by Watt—made people more resistant to being predictively (or predictably) programmed? Or has it served as part of the programming? Or both?
Has the idea of the second matrix (as coined by Horsley) helped people to become less trapped within it? Or has it added a new wing of mirrors for them to get lost in? Or both?
Implant Priming
Back to Watt:
This is a scientific order in that sense, and look at the kinds of scientific progress that are announced today, even the stuff that is admitted. It’s a tremendous progress and things are moving extremely fast at this point. And we see the drive on now for what they said they would do, which is to have a controlled population. The VeriChip [Radio Frequency ID implant] now is taking on stockholders. They’ve got implants being done in different peoples. The Mexican government mandated that their own employees must all take the chip in their arm right now to be employed [in 2004]. We’ve got IBM promoting their virtual reality, and obviously it will be perfected when you have a brain chip: you will think you’re in a room with people but it will be a simulated room with simulated people. This is all in the open now.
Red Ice’s Henrik Palmgren:
Regarding the VeriChip, this has been introduced now on the stock market. An interesting note was that they go through this screening process, the IPO, initial public offering process where the VeriChip during this project was actually getting a lot of criticism because the security in these chips was apparently lousy, and the stock owners or potential stock owners wanted the information on this and just how weak it was. They said that they actually can clone the chips and tap the information on it.
Watt:
They can clone your ID and steal the ID code. That’s a red herring. Whatever they give to the public is meant for us to follow. They want us to then respond, “Oh no, we want it more secure,” rather than say we don’t want it at all. To get them to their ballgame.
Palmgren:
It’s like a double ritual with these lousy, non-secure chips they’re passing around
Watt:
They want us to fall into the argument, which is the side road they want us to take, of demanding that they make it secure, rather than say we demand that they abolish the thing altogether.
I remember the stories about the implant, back in 2004. (In the UK, it looked like they would be introduced after the Soham girls were murdered in 2002; I mentioned it in Matrix Warrior.) The microchip implant was being pushed again in the 2010s, as I recall, because I joked to my wife, half-seriously, that we should invest in it as a guaranteed stock market winner.
So are they floating ideas to see what sort of resistance they generate? And are the various conspiracy commentaries acting as a sort of limited hang-out to create a complementary “cry Beast” narrative that never quite happens?
Now, digital ID that may or may not get linked to new mRNA “vaccines” seems to have largely replaced the RFID implant as the thing we will need to buy, sell, or trade within the matrix. The new microchip implant is Musk’s neurolink, which is more about cognitive augmentation and other super-powers (as well as the supposed health benefits), and about accessing the virtual realm (the literal matrix) in a more direct and immersive fashion.2
Awareness is Not Enough
“Conspiracy consciousness” has experienced a major spike since QAnon and Covid. And yet people who knew enough not to trust Big Pharma in 2019 rolled over for the mRNA during subsequent years. So why assume that the post-covid awareness of “vaccine-injuries,” etc., will in any way prevent people from falling for the next iteration of the same scam?
All the evidence suggests that cognitive awareness isn’t enough.
The weapons of parasocial programming being deployed to generate “mass formation” (another new term recently coined) bypass cognitive faculties entirely.
Doublethink is the ability to believe two contradictory things at once.
Such as that Trump is the father of the mRNA vaccine behind the new AI Stargate drive for a whole new batch, while also being opposed to the Deep Pharma agenda to turn humanity into an internet of bodies. (Ditto Musk, with his brain-link, is the guy fighting transhumanist woke agendas.)
Information cannot help us to make the right choices if it doesn’t land on a bedrock of sentience.
As we have seen, programmed people can be “reprogrammed” to be conspiracy-conscious (QAnon, and now Trump 2.0); but it’s just a temporary new sub-setting in a cognitive binary system (for or against, passive or aggressive, submissive or revolting).
When the moment comes, the switch is flipped again, and they are looking to the newly-branded oligarchic Archons to save them, again.
Free articles happen whenever there is an overall weekly increase of 3+ paid subscribers. If/when the total number reaches 200, all written content will be free for as long as the number stays above 200. I am not greedily seeking endless expansion, only numerical stability.
There is 20% off for multiple submissions. Contact me for details.