glad to hear it; Academic Agent has come up before recently, & now I look I see I read his recent DJT post. Is there something of his you;d recommend I read to get an idea of where our worldviews most intersect?
Academic Agent is a very low quality, manipulative and untrustworthy individual. Odious, quite frankly. My humble opinion, but where he's concerned mine's not the only one...
He tried to get my channel taken down, after i made videos criticising him. Made multiple complaints, almost certainly co-ordinated with his minions, that resulted in two strikes.
He then slandered me, saying that i had been on a stream with someone who made remarks about his family (i've never streamed with anyone in my life). Then threatened legal action (on what grounds, i've no idea, criticism?).
He ended up in the comments melting down at me, and after a time he apologised for the strikes, and said i 'could make videos talking about him' (thats nice of him), as long as i didnt use his image in them. If he'd just asked me that in a comment from day one, i'd have done it.
The next day, after he'd apologised the night before, i woke up and found he'd deleted all the comments, which seemed a particularly disingenous and weird thing to do. I have screenshots of this on my YT community page, to which others were witness to and commented on.
He has form for all this, has run the same copybook off mass reporting and threatening legal action on at least two other accounts i know of (SJJ and Thomas Baden-Reiss), & presumably others.
To top it all off, he apparently has an Admin who operates as some sort of "Capo" for him, who was born a man and now identifies as a "woman" called "Evelyn". His regular streaming partner, named "John Dee" (after you know who), is a raving homo, who seems to have a particularly virulent hatred of women, and enjoys making jokes about Ukraininan civillians being killed by Russian drone strkes (this was one of the "struck vids" of mine that he reported for 'improper use of copyrighted material".
If you think this is just some feud, i can direct you to a number of other channels / accounts who've had similar experiences with AA.
Left me sad. Heavy and incredibly important content. Wish you well in all your endeavours, especially in relation to bearing all this amidst managing a fruitful/God-inspired life.
You seem to be doing incredibly well.
(Don't worry about the music bit...reuse, keep it simple, not corporate).
Not enough time for a useful response, but just to ask if you could keep going with these investigations as they line up so closely with things I’m trying to go into.
paedophilia is such an integral and inherent part of our (Western) societies that even when one is attempting to view a random movie on a medium s/a Netflix (purveyor of classics s/a, 'Cuties'), they inevitably are reminded of said phenomenon if not during the actual watching of said show then subsequent to it. More specifically, 2 nites ago i decided to take in a movie at said site, namely, 'The Boy Band Con: The Lou Pearlman Story'; wherein the architect (or, really, culprit) of said phenomenon of 'Boy Bands' (i.e., 'Back Street Boys'; 'Nsync'; 'O-Town'; 'Innosense'; etc.) - beginning in late '80's and culminating in the mid-aughts - was discovered to be a con-artist; as he had, in toto, stolen between 300 and 500 million from investors, banks and band members over a 30-year time span. Moreover, in following up and doing some research vis-a-vis said story post-viewing, i discovered that at least 2 members of the 'boy bands', Pearlman was responsible for creating and controlling, had accused him of, at the very least, inappropriate conduct of a sexual nature (Nick Bass of, 'Nsync'); and, even worse, bribing members with opportunities, gifts or money in exchange for sex (Rich Cronin of, 'LFO'). Needless to say, we live in such a sick and sordid culture it's really quite amazing that anyone is able to withstand it for any length of time. That is all! RGB-Y4 out!!
very astute observation that you made, Jasun, in one of the comments made subsequent to reading a portion of said book by Cheit, i.e, 'people have a very difficult time with ambiguity whilst attempting to make sense of these narratives, viz. we are indoctrinated into binary thinking wherein only 2 options are proffered to the masses for any event/narrative shown on tv; articles; alt news; etc..' A very interesting and intriguing insight vis-a-vis its implications for anyone trying to make sense of the stories of the day including but not limited to paedophilia. And, quite frankly, an insight that lends credence to those few researchers and truthers out there in the real world attempting to manifest a few morsels of truth vis-a-vis so many cases involving paedophilia of yesteryear that made the local, national and global news' headlines back in the day. More specifically, i'm thinking about the following cases: Johnny Gosch case in Iowa (see doc., 'Who Took Johnny?'); the Franklin scandal in Omaha, Nebraska (see doc., 'Conspiracy of Silence'); the, 'Ken & Barby' (i.e., Paul Bernardo & Karla Homolka), rape and murder case in Canada; the Jon Benet Ramsey death/murder in Boulder, Colorado (see doc., 'The Case of: JBR'); the Madeleine McCann Abduction/Murder case in Portugal (see Richard D. Hall's doc., 'Buried by Mainstream Media: The True Story of Madeleine McCann'); and, of course, the alluded to case of 'boy bands' in the usa and those in authority positions who took advantage of them in more ways than just monetary/financial ones (see doc., 'The Boy Band Con: The Lou Pearlman Story'). In each of these cases - and many others besides - one, who employs a keen sense of patience, diligence, assiduity, intuition, reason, imagination, ethics and memory will be in a much better position to be able to discern that the narratives proffered, by the mainstream press/government/alt media, to the masses is a 2-song dance, i.e., said parties are either guilty or innocent; whereas, as alluded to above, the truth of said scenarios is most often much more nuanced, complex, convoluted - and, most pertinently, ambiguous! To just highlight this fact by invoking one of the cases listed above - i.e., the McCann case in the UK/Portugal - one can show that despite this case being covered, analyzed and researched by both the mainstream press and alt media for close to 20 years now, no one is one step closer in coming to a/the truth vis-a-vis: (a) what actually transpired on that fateful day in Praia da Luz, Portugal, on the evening of May 03rd, 2007; and, most significantly, the status of the girl purportedly abducted, i.e., Madelein McCann. Moreover, no matter the medium (i.e., BBC; ITV; Richard D. Hall; David Icke; etc.; etc.), the interested viewer is only offered a binary vis-a-vis the case in question, for example, the parents are either guilty or innocent of negligence (or, in other more seedy narratives, accessory to child trafficking; sexual abuse; etc.). However, imho (and i'm sure yours, Jasun), this case appears to be one whereby a staged deception was invoked by those in power (Kakistocracy for lack of a better term to apply to those in high positions of power and control) to distract and divert the general populace's (i.e., UK; Portugal; and, subsequent to the case becoming more of a spectacle than story months later, many other Western countries) attention from bigger agendas occurring concurrently at this time {for example, the financial crisis in UK (and many other countries of the West) - and concomitant decision by governments to invoke, what should have been, the controversial decision to bail-in banks and other financial institutions in an attempt to resuscitate them}. Needless to say, if one is willing and open to buy into the idea of this mainstream narrative being a, 'staged deception' (i.e., more ambiguous than said stance of either 'guilty or innocent'), then they are going to be more receptive to its implication(s), i.e., the parents might have been a part of a network/ring of conduits for paedophilia; the parents may have been working as part of MI5/6 for a much larger agenda afoot at this time; the entire narrative may be bunk, viz., maybe Madeleine McCann is no more real than the Easter Bunny; maybe the McCann's - and friends - were sexually abusing Madeleine and something went horrifically wrong on - or before - the night in question; and, thereafter, a narrative was erected to save the skin of all those involved in said scenario. Suffice it to say, we - the viewers; researchers; journalists; alt news media; etc. - must be much more nuanced, complex and open in looking at any case in the mainstream/alt news media - especially ones that are as controversial, emotional and, maybe most significantly, mimetic as ones involving paedophilia. That is all! RGB-Y4 out!!
Hi Jasun,
I really enjoyed your recent Higherside interview - a surprising guest!
Big Mother, the Longhouse….there’s something in the air.
I recently finished reading The Populist Delusion and I cross my fingers for hearing you and Academic Agent talking about Elite Theory and Big Mother.
There are so many wonderful English thinkers at the moment, and I really do appreciate your perspective in these intense times.
glad to hear it; Academic Agent has come up before recently, & now I look I see I read his recent DJT post. Is there something of his you;d recommend I read to get an idea of where our worldviews most intersect?
Academic Agent is a very low quality, manipulative and untrustworthy individual. Odious, quite frankly. My humble opinion, but where he's concerned mine's not the only one...
not to invite gossip but it's a serious charge so maybe you can give a bit more info?
He tried to get my channel taken down, after i made videos criticising him. Made multiple complaints, almost certainly co-ordinated with his minions, that resulted in two strikes.
He then slandered me, saying that i had been on a stream with someone who made remarks about his family (i've never streamed with anyone in my life). Then threatened legal action (on what grounds, i've no idea, criticism?).
He ended up in the comments melting down at me, and after a time he apologised for the strikes, and said i 'could make videos talking about him' (thats nice of him), as long as i didnt use his image in them. If he'd just asked me that in a comment from day one, i'd have done it.
The next day, after he'd apologised the night before, i woke up and found he'd deleted all the comments, which seemed a particularly disingenous and weird thing to do. I have screenshots of this on my YT community page, to which others were witness to and commented on.
He has form for all this, has run the same copybook off mass reporting and threatening legal action on at least two other accounts i know of (SJJ and Thomas Baden-Reiss), & presumably others.
To top it all off, he apparently has an Admin who operates as some sort of "Capo" for him, who was born a man and now identifies as a "woman" called "Evelyn". His regular streaming partner, named "John Dee" (after you know who), is a raving homo, who seems to have a particularly virulent hatred of women, and enjoys making jokes about Ukraininan civillians being killed by Russian drone strkes (this was one of the "struck vids" of mine that he reported for 'improper use of copyrighted material".
If you think this is just some feud, i can direct you to a number of other channels / accounts who've had similar experiences with AA.
that's OK, i'll take your word for it; I wasn't all that impressed by what i read anyway.
What do you think, Crumpet?
Hi Jasun,
I just finished his book ‘Populist Delusion’ this weekend and it packed a lot into 125 pages.
I like his high / low brow approach to things, so I also enjoy his ‘rank punditry’ on his YouTube channel as well.
Thank you Jasun.
Left me sad. Heavy and incredibly important content. Wish you well in all your endeavours, especially in relation to bearing all this amidst managing a fruitful/God-inspired life.
You seem to be doing incredibly well.
(Don't worry about the music bit...reuse, keep it simple, not corporate).
thanks; you saw this was from 8 years ago?
Gosh, no. Should've read I guess 😳 Needed to crack on with some garden work. Simply listened as I worked.
Good though that it's 8 years behind you.
Not enough time for a useful response, but just to ask if you could keep going with these investigations as they line up so closely with things I’m trying to go into.
I don’t mind if you play the tunes twice.
I always look forward to your podcasts!! keep em coming
paedophilia is such an integral and inherent part of our (Western) societies that even when one is attempting to view a random movie on a medium s/a Netflix (purveyor of classics s/a, 'Cuties'), they inevitably are reminded of said phenomenon if not during the actual watching of said show then subsequent to it. More specifically, 2 nites ago i decided to take in a movie at said site, namely, 'The Boy Band Con: The Lou Pearlman Story'; wherein the architect (or, really, culprit) of said phenomenon of 'Boy Bands' (i.e., 'Back Street Boys'; 'Nsync'; 'O-Town'; 'Innosense'; etc.) - beginning in late '80's and culminating in the mid-aughts - was discovered to be a con-artist; as he had, in toto, stolen between 300 and 500 million from investors, banks and band members over a 30-year time span. Moreover, in following up and doing some research vis-a-vis said story post-viewing, i discovered that at least 2 members of the 'boy bands', Pearlman was responsible for creating and controlling, had accused him of, at the very least, inappropriate conduct of a sexual nature (Nick Bass of, 'Nsync'); and, even worse, bribing members with opportunities, gifts or money in exchange for sex (Rich Cronin of, 'LFO'). Needless to say, we live in such a sick and sordid culture it's really quite amazing that anyone is able to withstand it for any length of time. That is all! RGB-Y4 out!!
very astute observation that you made, Jasun, in one of the comments made subsequent to reading a portion of said book by Cheit, i.e, 'people have a very difficult time with ambiguity whilst attempting to make sense of these narratives, viz. we are indoctrinated into binary thinking wherein only 2 options are proffered to the masses for any event/narrative shown on tv; articles; alt news; etc..' A very interesting and intriguing insight vis-a-vis its implications for anyone trying to make sense of the stories of the day including but not limited to paedophilia. And, quite frankly, an insight that lends credence to those few researchers and truthers out there in the real world attempting to manifest a few morsels of truth vis-a-vis so many cases involving paedophilia of yesteryear that made the local, national and global news' headlines back in the day. More specifically, i'm thinking about the following cases: Johnny Gosch case in Iowa (see doc., 'Who Took Johnny?'); the Franklin scandal in Omaha, Nebraska (see doc., 'Conspiracy of Silence'); the, 'Ken & Barby' (i.e., Paul Bernardo & Karla Homolka), rape and murder case in Canada; the Jon Benet Ramsey death/murder in Boulder, Colorado (see doc., 'The Case of: JBR'); the Madeleine McCann Abduction/Murder case in Portugal (see Richard D. Hall's doc., 'Buried by Mainstream Media: The True Story of Madeleine McCann'); and, of course, the alluded to case of 'boy bands' in the usa and those in authority positions who took advantage of them in more ways than just monetary/financial ones (see doc., 'The Boy Band Con: The Lou Pearlman Story'). In each of these cases - and many others besides - one, who employs a keen sense of patience, diligence, assiduity, intuition, reason, imagination, ethics and memory will be in a much better position to be able to discern that the narratives proffered, by the mainstream press/government/alt media, to the masses is a 2-song dance, i.e., said parties are either guilty or innocent; whereas, as alluded to above, the truth of said scenarios is most often much more nuanced, complex, convoluted - and, most pertinently, ambiguous! To just highlight this fact by invoking one of the cases listed above - i.e., the McCann case in the UK/Portugal - one can show that despite this case being covered, analyzed and researched by both the mainstream press and alt media for close to 20 years now, no one is one step closer in coming to a/the truth vis-a-vis: (a) what actually transpired on that fateful day in Praia da Luz, Portugal, on the evening of May 03rd, 2007; and, most significantly, the status of the girl purportedly abducted, i.e., Madelein McCann. Moreover, no matter the medium (i.e., BBC; ITV; Richard D. Hall; David Icke; etc.; etc.), the interested viewer is only offered a binary vis-a-vis the case in question, for example, the parents are either guilty or innocent of negligence (or, in other more seedy narratives, accessory to child trafficking; sexual abuse; etc.). However, imho (and i'm sure yours, Jasun), this case appears to be one whereby a staged deception was invoked by those in power (Kakistocracy for lack of a better term to apply to those in high positions of power and control) to distract and divert the general populace's (i.e., UK; Portugal; and, subsequent to the case becoming more of a spectacle than story months later, many other Western countries) attention from bigger agendas occurring concurrently at this time {for example, the financial crisis in UK (and many other countries of the West) - and concomitant decision by governments to invoke, what should have been, the controversial decision to bail-in banks and other financial institutions in an attempt to resuscitate them}. Needless to say, if one is willing and open to buy into the idea of this mainstream narrative being a, 'staged deception' (i.e., more ambiguous than said stance of either 'guilty or innocent'), then they are going to be more receptive to its implication(s), i.e., the parents might have been a part of a network/ring of conduits for paedophilia; the parents may have been working as part of MI5/6 for a much larger agenda afoot at this time; the entire narrative may be bunk, viz., maybe Madeleine McCann is no more real than the Easter Bunny; maybe the McCann's - and friends - were sexually abusing Madeleine and something went horrifically wrong on - or before - the night in question; and, thereafter, a narrative was erected to save the skin of all those involved in said scenario. Suffice it to say, we - the viewers; researchers; journalists; alt news media; etc. - must be much more nuanced, complex and open in looking at any case in the mainstream/alt news media - especially ones that are as controversial, emotional and, maybe most significantly, mimetic as ones involving paedophilia. That is all! RGB-Y4 out!!
2016 feels like it could have been last century